[petsc-users] [EXTERNAL] Re: Problem with PCFIELDSPLIT
Tang, Qi
tangqi at msu.edu
Tue Jul 13 23:12:12 CDT 2021
Hi,
During the process to experiment the suggestion Matt made, we ran into some questions regarding to TSSolve vs KSPSolve. We got different initial unpreconditioned residual using two solvers. Let’s say we solve the problem with backward Euler and there is no rhs. We guess TSSolve solves
(U^{n+1}-U^n)/dt = A U^{n+1}.
(We only provides IJacobian in this case and turn on TS_LINEAR.)
So we guess the initial unpreconditioned residual would be ||U^n/dt||_2, which seems different from the residual we got from a backward Euler stepping we implemented by ourself through KSPSolve.
Do we have some misunderstanding on TSSolve?
Thanks,
Qi
T5 at LANL
On Jul 7, 2021, at 3:54 PM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com<mailto:knepley at gmail.com>> wrote:
On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 2:33 PM Jorti, Zakariae <zjorti at lanl.gov<mailto:zjorti at lanl.gov>> wrote:
Hi Matt,
Thanks for your quick reply.
I have not completely understood your suggestion, could you please elaborate a bit more?
For your convenience, here is how I am proceeding for the moment in my code:
TSGetKSP(ts,&ksp);
KSPGetPC(ksp,&pc);
PCSetType(pc,PCFIELDSPLIT);
PCFieldSplitSetDetectSaddlePoint(pc,PETSC_TRUE);
PCSetUp(pc);
PCFieldSplitGetSubKSP(pc, &n, &subksp);
KSPGetPC(subksp[1], &(subpc[1]));
I do not like the two lines above. We should not have to do this.
KSPSetOperators(subksp[1],T,T);
In the above line, I want you to use a separate preconditioning matrix M, instead of T. That way, it will provide
the preconditioning matrix for your Schur complement problem.
Thanks,
Matt
KSPSetUp(subksp[1]);
PetscFree(subksp);
TSSolve(ts,X);
Thank you.
Best,
Zakariae
________________________________
From: Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com<mailto:knepley at gmail.com>>
Sent: Wednesday, July 7, 2021 12:11:10 PM
To: Jorti, Zakariae
Cc: petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov<mailto:petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov>; Tang, Qi; Tang, Xianzhu
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [petsc-users] Problem with PCFIELDSPLIT
On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 1:51 PM Jorti, Zakariae via petsc-users <petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov<mailto:petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov>> wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to build a PCFIELDSPLIT preconditioner for a matrix
J = [A00 A01]
[A10 A11]
that has the following shape:
M_{user}^{-1} = [I -ksp(A00) A01] [ksp(A00) 0] [I 0]
[0 I] [0 ksp(T)] [-A10 ksp(A00) I ]
where T is a user-defined Schur complement approximation that replaces the true Schur complement S:= A11 - A10 ksp(A00) A01.
I am trying to do something similar to this example (lines 41--45 and 116--121): https://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/petsc-current/src/snes/tutorials/ex70.c.html<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/petsc-current/src/snes/tutorials/ex70.c.html__;!!HXCxUKc!hoEfgnaraTfQoSgAiplsc6GJ_HuPXN88m5AJVy1gb7WVMNkGENDnJ3zToOGlhw$>
The problem I have is that I manage to replace S with T on a separate single linear system but not for the linear systems generated by my time-dependent PDE. Even if I set the preconditioner M_{user}^{-1} correctly, the T matrix gets replaced by S in the preconditioner once I call TSSolve.
Do you have any suggestions how to fix this knowing that the matrix J does not change over time?
I don't like how it is done in that example for this very reason.
When I want to use a custom preconditioning matrix for the Schur complement, I always give a preconditioning matrix M to the outer solve.
Then PCFIELDSPLIT automatically pulls the correct block from M, (1,1) for the Schur complement, for that preconditioning matrix without
extra code. Can you do this?
Thanks,
Matt
Many thanks.
Best regards,
Zakariae
--
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/*knepley/__;fg!!HXCxUKc!hoEfgnaraTfQoSgAiplsc6GJ_HuPXN88m5AJVy1gb7WVMNkGENDnJ3wB3dcMFw$>
--
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/*knepley/__;fg!!HXCxUKc!hoEfgnaraTfQoSgAiplsc6GJ_HuPXN88m5AJVy1gb7WVMNkGENDnJ3wB3dcMFw$>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20210714/24ed8059/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the petsc-users
mailing list