[petsc-users] [SPAM] Re: Installation failure
Satish Balay
balay at mcs.anl.gov
Tue Jul 28 00:38:09 CDT 2020
something went wrong - but petsc configure didn't capture this error.
You can retry with:
./configure PETSC_ARCH=linux-intel --with-cc=mpiicc --with-cxx=0 --with-fc=mpiifort --with-blaslapack-dir=/opt/intel/compilers_and_libraries_2016/linux/mkl --with-scalar-type=complex --with-64-bit-indices
And perhaps add one more option: LIBS="-Bstatic -lifcore -Bdynamic"
Note: --with-64-bit-blas-indices is not appropriate here.
Satish
On Tue, 28 Jul 2020, Rubem Mondaini wrote:
> Dear Barry,
>
> thank you very much for the reply. I removed the options "--with-mpi-include"
> and "--with-mpi-lib", but I still get the same error. I attach the
> configure.log file.
>
> I can confirm that I can compile and run other codes with my compilers,
> however.
>
> Many thanks!
>
> Rubem
>
> On 7/28/20 10:32 AM, Barry Smith wrote:
> > Hmm, configure is a mess.
> >
> > Since you explicitly use MPI compilers
> >
> > --with-cc=mpiicc --with-cxx=mpiicpc --with-fc=mpiifort
> >
> > the
> >
> > --with-mpi-include=/opt/intel/compilers_and_libraries_2016/linux/mpi/intel64/include
> > --with-mpi-lib=/opt/intel/compilers_and_libraries_2016.3.210/linux/mpi/intel64/lib/libmpicxx.a
> >
> > are not needed and should not be provided (Satish I thought this would
> > generate an error? Why doesn't it?)
> >
> > Please try without those arguments and send the configure.log if it
> > fails.
> >
> > The error message isn't completely right.
> >
> > Cannot run executables created with C.
> >
> > This is because the call the call to
> > self.setCompilers.checkCompiler('C') doesn't have enough context to
> > print a decent error message.
> >
> > Barry
> >
> >
> >> On Jul 27, 2020, at 2:06 AM, Rubem Mondaini <rmondaini at csrc.ac.cn> wrote:
> >>
> >> Dears,
> >>
> >> I have tried to install the PETSc library on my machine and I am failing. I
> >> have managed to install it on another one, which possess similar
> >> configurations for the compilers, and there things do seem to be very much
> >> fine.
> >>
> >> I am attaching the corresponding configure.log. Is there something simple
> >> that I am missing?
> >>
> >> Best,
> >>
> >>
> >> <configure.log>
>
More information about the petsc-users
mailing list