[petsc-users] reproduced the problem

[Povolotskyi, Mykhailo]

Dear Matthew and Satish,

I just wrote that the error disappeared, but it still exists (I had to 
wait longer).

The configuration log can be accessed here:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/tmkksemu294j719/configure.log?dl=0

Sorry for the last e-mail.

Michael.


On 09/20/2019 03:53 PM, Balay, Satish wrote:
> --with-64-bit-indices=1 => PetscInt = int64_t
> --known-64-bit-blas-indices=1 => blas specified uses 64bit indices.
>
> What is your requirement (use case)?
>
> Satish
>
> On Fri, 20 Sep 2019, Povolotskyi, Mykhailo via petsc-users wrote:
>
>> Does it mean I have to configure petsc with --with-64-bit-indices=1 ?
>>
>> On 09/20/2019 03:41 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 1:55 PM Povolotskyi, Mykhailo via petsc-users <petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov<mailto:petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov>> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm upgrading petsc from 3.8 to 3.11.
>>
>> In doing so, I see an error message:
>>
>>    UNABLE to CONFIGURE with GIVEN OPTIONS    (see configure.log for details):
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Cannot use SuperLU_DIST with 64 bit BLAS/Lapack indices
>> *******************************************************************************
>>
>> I wonder why this configuration step worked well for 3.8?  I did not
>> change anything else but version of petsc.
>>
>> This never worked. We are just checking now.
>>
>>    Thanks,
>>
>>      Matt
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Michael.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead.
>> -- Norbert Wiener
>>
>> https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/<http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/%7Eknepley/>
>>
>>