[petsc-users] question about installing petsc3.11

[Matthew Knepley]

On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 3:44 PM Povolotskyi, Mykhailo <mpovolot at purdue.edu>
wrote:

> Does it mean I have to configure petsc with --with-64-bit-indices=1 ?
>
If you do not send configure.log, we have no way of figuring out what is
going on.

  Thanks,

    Matt


> On 09/20/2019 03:41 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 1:55 PM Povolotskyi, Mykhailo via petsc-users <
> petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm upgrading petsc from 3.8 to 3.11.
>>
>> In doing so, I see an error message:
>>
>>   UNABLE to CONFIGURE with GIVEN OPTIONS    (see configure.log for
>> details):
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Cannot use SuperLU_DIST with 64 bit BLAS/Lapack indices
>>
>> *******************************************************************************
>>
>> I wonder why this configuration step worked well for 3.8?  I did not
>> change anything else but version of petsc.
>>
>
> This never worked. We are just checking now.
>
>   Thanks,
>
>     Matt
>
>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Michael.
>>
>>
>
> --
> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
> experiments lead.
> -- Norbert Wiener
>
> https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/
> <http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/%7Eknepley/>
>
>
>

-- 
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener

https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ <http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20190920/09acb560/attachment-0001.html>