[petsc-users] PETSc 3.12 with .f90 files

[Balay, Satish]

On Tue, 29 Oct 2019, Matthew Knepley via petsc-users wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 2:35 PM Smith, Barry F. <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> 
> >
> >    The problem is that this change DOES use the preprocessor on the f90
> > file, does it not? We need a rule that does not use the preprocessor.
> >
> 
> This change just calls the Fortran compiler on it. The compiler decides to
> use the preprocessor based on the extension (I thought).

With older releases, the primary difference between .f.o and .F.o are flag related to FPP

${PETSC_FC_INCLUDES} ${PETSCFLAGS} ${FPP_FLAGS} ${FPPFLAGS}

Perhaps this difference won't matter with most compilers.. [when compiling .f sources]

Satish

> 
>   Thanks,
> 
>     Matt
> 
> 
> >    Barry
> >
> >
> > > On Oct 29, 2019, at 10:50 AM, Matthew Knepley via petsc-users <
> > petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 11:38 AM Randall Mackie <rlmackie862 at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > Hi Matt,
> > >
> > > That worked and everything compiles correctly now.
> > >
> > > Great.
> > >
> > >   https://gitlab.com/petsc/petsc/merge_requests/2236
> > >
> > >   Thanks,
> > >
> > >     Matt
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Randy
> > >
> > >
> > >> On Oct 29, 2019, at 8:29 AM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 11:25 AM Randall Mackie <rlmackie862 at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >> Correct, no preprocessing.
> > >>
> > >> Okay. I am not sure why it would have been remove, but you can try
> > adding .f90 to lib/petsc/conf/ruls line 273
> > >> and see if that fixes it.
> > >>
> > >>   THanks,
> > >>
> > >>     Matt
> > >>> On Oct 29, 2019, at 8:24 AM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 10:54 AM Randall Mackie via petsc-users <
> > petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> > >>> Dear PETSc users:
> > >>>
> > >>> In our code, we have one or two small .f90 files that are part of the
> > software, and they have always compiled without any issues with previous
> > versions of PETSc, using standard PETSc make files.
> > >>>
> > >>> However, starting with PETSc 3.12, they no longer compile.
> > >>>
> > >>> Was there some reasons for this change and any suggestion as to how to
> > deal with this?
> > >>>
> > >>> My cursory look cannot find a compile rule for .f90, only .F90. Di you
> > not want preprocessing on that file?
> > >>>
> > >>>   Thanks,
> > >>>
> > >>>     Matt
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks, Randy
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
> > experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
> > experiments lead.
> > >>> -- Norbert Wiener
> > >>>
> > >>> https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
> > experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
> > experiments lead.
> > >> -- Norbert Wiener
> > >>
> > >> https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
> > experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
> > experiments lead.
> > > -- Norbert Wiener
> > >
> > > https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/
> >
> >
> 
>