[petsc-users] Any reason for API change: DMGetWorkArray()

[Fande Kong]

Thanks, Matt,

And then what is the reason to remove PetscDataType? I am out of curiosity.

DMGetWorkArray is a little misleading. This may/might make people think the
routine is related to MPI, but it does not have anything to do with MPI.

Thanks,

Fande,

On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 3:22 PM Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:

> We are trying to eliminate PetscDataType.
>
>   Matt
>
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:10 PM Fande Kong via petsc-users <
> petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> The second parameter is changed from PetscDataType to MPI_Datatype
>> starting from PETSc-3.9.x
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Fande Kong,
>>
>
>
> --
> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
> experiments lead.
> -- Norbert Wiener
>
> https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/
> <http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20190110/3410b6eb/attachment.html>