[petsc-users] How to use f2py on a PETSc/SLEPc-based fortran code
Barry Smith
bsmith at mcs.anl.gov
Wed Mar 22 13:23:35 CDT 2017
> On Mar 22, 2017, at 1:08 PM, Austin Herrema <aherrema at iastate.edu> wrote:
>
> Thank you for the suggestion! Seems like a reasonable way to go. Not working for me, however, I suspect because I'm using homebrew installations of PETSc and SLEPc (I don't think all the makefiles are kept). Any other way to do the same thing by chance? Worst case I could use a non-homebrew installation but I'd prefer not to mess with that if I can help it...
How do you link a "regular" SLEPc C program using the home-brew libraries? You need basically the same link line for f2py as you need for C programs.
>
> Thanks,
> Austin
>
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:20 AM Jose E. Roman <jroman at dsic.upv.es> wrote:
> Try the following:
> $ cd $SLEPC_DIR
> $ make getlinklibs_slepc
> Then copy the output and paste it at the end of your f2py command.
>
> Jose
>
>
> > El 22 mar 2017, a las 16:38, Austin Herrema <aherrema at iastate.edu> escribió:
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I am trying to do as the subject line describes--use f2py to run a large PETSc/SLEPc fortran finite element code through python. I really only need to wrap the outermost function of the fortran code--don't need any access to subroutines. I'll describe what I'm doing, some of which I'm not 100% confident is correct (not much experience with f2py)--feel free to correct/redirect any of it.
> >
> > First, I'm editing the fortran code so that the top-level function is a subroutine rather than a main program (it's my understanding that this is required for f2py?).
> >
> > I use my regular makefile (modeled after a standard SLEPc makefile from the user guide) to compile all of the .f90/.F90 files (many of them) to .o files using SLEPc/PETSc rules. The final linking phase fails since there isn't a main program, but I'm just ignoring that for now since that's not what I ultimately need...
> >
> > Using a python script, I set up and run the f2py command. Right now it has the form...
> > "f2py -c -m modname outer_driver.f90 file1.o file2.o file3.o..." etc.
> >
> > This appears to work, but upon attempting to import, it cannot find the SLEPc (and, I presume, PETSc) objects/functions:
> >
> > >>> import mod_name
> > Traceback (most recent call last):
> > File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
> > ImportError: dlopen(./mod_name.so, 2): Symbol not found: _epscreate_
> > Referenced from: ./mod_name.so
> > Expected in: flat namespace
> > in ./mod_name.so
> >
> > Based on this discussion, I believe I need to somehow include PETSc/SLEPc info when linking with f2py. Is that correct? Any direction on how to do that? I don't quite understand what the OP of that question ultimately ended up doing to get it to work. I tried using the -I flag pointing to the slepc_common file (like the SLEPc makefile does). The problem is that that is a file, not a directory, which contains a number of other makefile-style variables--so it works to include it in a makefile, but doesn't work in python. Maybe there are only a few directories I really need to include? Or is it possible to somehow run f2py through a makefile? I'm a bit ignorant in that realm as well.
> >
> > Thank you for any help or suggestions!
> > Austin
> >
> >
> > --
> > Austin Herrema
> > PhD Student | Graduate Research Assistant | Iowa State University
> > Wind Energy Science, Engineering, and Policy | Mechanical Engineering
>
> --
> Austin Herrema
> PhD Student | Graduate Research Assistant | Iowa State University
> Wind Energy Science, Engineering, and Policy | Mechanical Engineering
More information about the petsc-users
mailing list