[petsc-users] How to use f2py on a PETSc/SLEPc-based fortran code
Austin Herrema
aherrema at iastate.edu
Wed Mar 22 13:08:22 CDT 2017
Thank you for the suggestion! Seems like a reasonable way to go. Not
working for me, however, I suspect because I'm using homebrew installations
of PETSc and SLEPc (I don't think all the makefiles are kept). Any other
way to do the same thing by chance? Worst case I could use a non-homebrew
installation but I'd prefer not to mess with that if I can help it...
Thanks,
Austin
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:20 AM Jose E. Roman <jroman at dsic.upv.es> wrote:
> Try the following:
> $ cd $SLEPC_DIR
> $ make getlinklibs_slepc
> Then copy the output and paste it at the end of your f2py command.
>
> Jose
>
>
> > El 22 mar 2017, a las 16:38, Austin Herrema <aherrema at iastate.edu>
> escribió:
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I am trying to do as the subject line describes--use f2py to run a large
> PETSc/SLEPc fortran finite element code through python. I really only need
> to wrap the outermost function of the fortran code--don't need any access
> to subroutines. I'll describe what I'm doing, some of which I'm not 100%
> confident is correct (not much experience with f2py)--feel free to
> correct/redirect any of it.
> >
> > First, I'm editing the fortran code so that the top-level function is a
> subroutine rather than a main program (it's my understanding that this is
> required for f2py?).
> >
> > I use my regular makefile (modeled after a standard SLEPc makefile from
> the user guide) to compile all of the .f90/.F90 files (many of them) to .o
> files using SLEPc/PETSc rules. The final linking phase fails since there
> isn't a main program, but I'm just ignoring that for now since that's not
> what I ultimately need...
> >
> > Using a python script, I set up and run the f2py command. Right now it
> has the form...
> > "f2py -c -m modname outer_driver.f90 file1.o file2.o file3.o..." etc.
> >
> > This appears to work, but upon attempting to import, it cannot find the
> SLEPc (and, I presume, PETSc) objects/functions:
> >
> > >>> import mod_name
> > Traceback (most recent call last):
> > File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
> > ImportError: dlopen(./mod_name.so, 2): Symbol not found: _epscreate_
> > Referenced from: ./mod_name.so
> > Expected in: flat namespace
> > in ./mod_name.so
> >
> > Based on this discussion, I believe I need to somehow include
> PETSc/SLEPc info when linking with f2py. Is that correct? Any direction on
> how to do that? I don't quite understand what the OP of that question
> ultimately ended up doing to get it to work. I tried using the -I flag
> pointing to the slepc_common file (like the SLEPc makefile does). The
> problem is that that is a file, not a directory, which contains a number of
> other makefile-style variables--so it works to include it in a makefile,
> but doesn't work in python. Maybe there are only a few directories I really
> need to include? Or is it possible to somehow run f2py through a makefile?
> I'm a bit ignorant in that realm as well.
> >
> > Thank you for any help or suggestions!
> > Austin
> >
> >
> > --
> > Austin Herrema
> > PhD Student | Graduate Research Assistant | Iowa State University
> > Wind Energy Science, Engineering, and Policy | Mechanical Engineering
>
> --
*Austin Herrema*
PhD Student | Graduate Research Assistant | Iowa State University
Wind Energy Science, Engineering, and Policy | Mechanical Engineering
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20170322/f4c9a461/attachment.html>
More information about the petsc-users
mailing list