[petsc-users] ASM with matrix-free method
Sonia Pozzi
sonia.pozzi at usi.ch
Thu Feb 2 08:55:22 CST 2017
Dear Barry,
At the moment I’m dealing with the following problem.
Suppose I want to solve Sx=b, where is a product of matrices. In particular inside it contains also an inverse of a matrix.
To compute the action of S I have created a shell matrix, but know I would like to apply the ASM as preconditioner.
Citing your words as answer to a previous similar question:
Thu Jan 13 13:14:47 CST 2011
Is it possible use ASM and/or FieldSplit with a matrix-free method?
"Yes, BUT the algorithms are coded around MatGetSubMatrix() and or MatGetSubMatrices() so to do matrix free you need to have code that applies "part" of the operator at a time (that is you cannot just have a matrix vector product that applies the entire operator to the entire vector. Once you have the ability to apply "part" of the operator at a time you need to code up a MATSHELL that responds appropriately to MatGetSubMatrix() and or MatGetSubMatrices() and returns new matrix-free shell matrices that apply only "their" part of the operator. This is non-trivial for many people but possible."
Could you be so kind to explain me better how, or do you have some code that is doing something similar?
Regards,
Sonia
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20170202/9b7d50b5/attachment.html>
More information about the petsc-users
mailing list