[petsc-users] Clarification on PCASMSetLocalSubdomain is and is_local
Luc Berger-Vergiat
lb2653 at columbia.edu
Thu Jun 2 17:27:14 CDT 2016
Ok I get it, then if I have multiple subdomains on the local processor
is and is_local will be arrays of is that represent each subdomain on
that processor?
Best,
Luc
On 06/02/2016 06:21 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 5:11 PM, Luc Berger-Vergiat
> <lb2653 at columbia.edu <mailto:lb2653 at columbia.edu>> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> I would like a quick clarification on what is and is_local are
> representing in the PCASMSetLocalSubdomains().
> My understanding is that if I have two mpi ranks and four
> subdomains I can end up having four blocks that I can denote as
> follows:
>
> | domain1 | domain2 | domain3 | domain3 |
> rank1 | block11 | block12 | block13 | |
> rank2 | block21 | block22 | -- | block24 |
>
> to each blockIJ I associate isIJ.
>
> So for rank1 I will have is=[1,2,3] and is_local=[is11,is12,is13],
> and for rank2 I will have is=[1,2,4] and is_local=[is21,is22,is24].
> Or am I not understanding things correctly?
>
>
> I did not understand the above.
>
> The best way to think of this is algebraically. Suppose you have a
> matrix A, and you divide the rows into k disjoint sets where each
> process gets one set. Then is_local on each process is a list of the
> rows in that set. Now we also allow some overlap, which means
> rows in other sets are also used. The is on each process contains both
> is_local and these extra rows from other sets.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt
>
>
> --
> Best,
> Luc
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which
> their experiments lead.
> -- Norbert Wiener
--
Best,
Luc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20160602/09d7de8f/attachment.html>
More information about the petsc-users
mailing list