[petsc-users] (no subject)

[neok m4700]

Re,

Makes sense to read the documentation, I will try with another
preconditioners.

Thanks for the support.

2016-06-02 18:15 GMT+02:00 Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com>:

> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 11:10 AM, neok m4700 <neok.m4700 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Satish,
>>
>> Thanks for the correction.
>>
>> The error message is now slightly different, but the result is the same
>> (serial runs fine, parallel with mpirun fails with following error):
>>
>
> Now the error is correct. You are asking to run ICC in parallel, which we
> do not support. It is telling you
> to look at the table of available solvers.
>
>   Thanks,
>
>     Matt
>
>
>> [0] KSPSolve() line 599 in <...>/src/ksp/ksp/interface/itfunc.c
>> [0] KSPSetUp() line 390 in <...>/src/ksp/ksp/interface/itfunc.c
>> [0] PCSetUp() line 968 in <...>/src/ksp/pc/interface/precon.c
>> [0] PCSetUp_ICC() line 21 in<...>/src/ksp/pc/impls/factor/icc/icc.c
>> [0] MatGetFactor() line 4291 in <...>/src/mat/interface/matrix.c
>> [0] See http://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/documentation/linearsolvertable.html
>> for possible LU and Cholesky solvers
>> [0] Could not locate a solver package. Perhaps you must ./configure with
>> --download-<package>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2016-06-02 17:58 GMT+02:00 Satish Balay <balay at mcs.anl.gov>:
>>
>>> with petsc-master - you would have to use petsc4py-master.
>>>
>>> i.e try petsc-eab7b92 with petsc4py-6e8e093
>>>
>>> Satish
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, 2 Jun 2016, neok m4700 wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi Matthew,
>>> >
>>> > I've rebuilt petsc // petsc4py with following versions:
>>> >
>>> > 3.7.0 // 3.7.0 => same runtime error
>>> > 00c67f3 // 3.7.1 => fails to build petsc4py (error below)
>>> > 00c67f3 // 6e8e093 => same as above
>>> > f1b0812 (latest commit) // 6e8e093 (latest commit) => same as above
>>> >
>>> > In file included from src/PETSc.c:3:0:
>>> > src/petsc4py.PETSc.c: In function
>>> > ‘__pyx_pf_8petsc4py_5PETSc_6DMPlex_4createBoxMesh’:
>>> > src/petsc4py.PETSc.c:214629:112: error: incompatible type for argument
>>> 4 of
>>> > ‘DMPlexCreateBoxMesh’
>>> >    __pyx_t_4 =
>>> > __pyx_f_8petsc4py_5PETSc_CHKERR(DMPlexCreateBoxMesh(__pyx_v_ccomm,
>>> > __pyx_v_cdim, __pyx_v_interp, (&__pyx_v_newdm))); if
>>> (unlikely(__pyx_t_4 ==
>>> > -1)) __PYX_ERR(42, 49, __pyx_L1_error)
>>> >
>>> > using
>>> > - numpy 1.11.0
>>> > - openblas 0.2.18
>>> > - openmpi 1.10.2
>>> >
>>> > Thanks
>>> >
>>> > 2016-06-02 16:39 GMT+02:00 Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com>:
>>> >
>>> > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 9:12 AM, neok m4700 <neok.m4700 at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >> Hi,
>>> > >>
>>> > >> I built petsc 3.7.1 and petsc4py 3.7.0 (with openmpi 1.10.2) and
>>> ran the
>>> > >> examples in the demo directory.
>>> > >>
>>> > >
>>> > > I believe this was fixed in 'master':
>>> > >
>>> https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc/commits/00c67f3b09c0bcda06af5ed306d845d9138e5003
>>> > >
>>> > > Is it possible to try this?
>>> > >
>>> > >   Thanks,
>>> > >
>>> > >     Matt
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >> $ python test_mat_ksp.py
>>> > >> => runs as expected (serial)
>>> > >>
>>> > >> $ mpiexec -np 2 python test_mat_ksp.py
>>> > >> => fails with the following output:
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>> > >>   File "<...>/demo/kspsolve/test_mat_ksp.py", line 15, in <module>
>>> > >>     execfile('petsc-ksp.py')
>>> > >>   File "<...>/demo/kspsolve/test_mat_ksp.py", line 6, in execfile
>>> > >>     try: exec(fh.read()+"\n", globals, locals)
>>> > >>   File "<string>", line 15, in <module>
>>> > >>   File "PETSc/KSP.pyx", line 384, in petsc4py.PETSc.KSP.solve
>>> > >> (src/petsc4py.PETSc.c:153555)
>>> > >> petsc4py.PETSc.Error: error code 92
>>> > >> [0] KSPSolve() line 599 in <...>/src/ksp/ksp/interface/itfunc.c
>>> > >> [0] KSPSetUp() line 390 in <...>/src/ksp/ksp/interface/itfunc.c
>>> > >> [0] PCSetUp() line 968 in <...>/src/ksp/pc/interface/precon.c
>>> > >> [0] PCSetUp_ICC() line 21 in <...>/src/ksp/pc/impls/factor/icc/icc.c
>>> > >> [0] MatGetFactor() line 4240 in<...>/src/mat/interface/matrix.c
>>> > >> [0] You cannot overwrite this option since that will conflict with
>>> other
>>> > >> previously set options
>>> > >> [0] Could not locate solver package (null). Perhaps you must
>>> ./configure
>>> > >> with --download-(null)
>>> > >>
>>> > >> <...>
>>> > >> -------------------------------------------------------
>>> > >> Primary job  terminated normally, but 1 process returned
>>> > >> a non-zero exit code.. Per user-direction, the job has been aborted.
>>> > >> -------------------------------------------------------
>>> > >>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > >> mpirun detected that one or more processes exited with non-zero
>>> status,
>>> > >> thus causing
>>> > >> the job to be terminated. The first process to do so was:
>>> > >>
>>> > >>   Process name: [[23110,1],0]
>>> > >>   Exit code:    1
>>> > >>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> What have I done wrong ?
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > --
>>> > > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
>>> > > experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which
>>> their
>>> > > experiments lead.
>>> > > -- Norbert Wiener
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
> experiments lead.
> -- Norbert Wiener
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20160602/1a5dff4f/attachment-0001.html>