[petsc-users] Are performance benchmarks available?

[Mark Adams]

This would be a good idea,
Please use SNES ex56 and send me the '-info | grep GAMG' result, and
-log_view, so that I can check that it looks OK.
Thanks,
Mark

On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:

>
>    While I agree that having this type of information available would be
> very useful it is surprisingly difficult to do this and keep it up to date,
> plus we have little time to do it, so unfortunately we don't having thing
> like this.
>
>    We should do this! Perhaps pick one or two problems and run them with
> say a simple preconditioner like ASM and then GAMG on a large problem with
> a couple of different number of processes, say 1, 32 and 256 then run them
> once a month to confirm they remain the same performance wise and make the
> performance numbers available on the web. Maybe using Mark's ex56.c case.
>
>    I'll try to set something up
>
>    Barry
>
>
> Always a big pain to try to automate the running on those damn batch
> systems!
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jun 30, 2016, at 9:20 AM, Faraz Hussain <faraz_hussain at yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > I am wondering if there are benchmarks available that I can solve on my
> cluster to compare performance? I want to compare how scaling up-to 240
> cores compares to large models already solved on an optimized
> configuration and hardware.
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20160708/5c949fa1/attachment.html>