[petsc-users] Question regarding updating PETSc Fortran examples to embrace post F77 constructs

[丁老师]

Dear sir:
        I think we might following the history trend, forgot fortran77. 
       We are facing HPC computation,so HPC fortran  is out choice.
Regard








At 2016-08-27 10:54:14, "Barry Smith" <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>
>   PETSc users,
>
>    We've always been very conservative in PETSc to keep almost all our Fortran examples in a format that works with classic FORTRAN 77 constructs: fixed line format, (72 character limit) and no use of ; to separate operations on the same line, etc. 
>
>   Is it time to forgo these constructs and use more modern Fortran conventions in all our examples?
>
>    Any feedback is appreciated
>
>    Barry
>
>Note: it would continue to be possible to use PETSc in the FORTRAN 77 style, this is just a question about updating the examples.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20160827/7f86d1e0/attachment.html>