[petsc-users] configure error on Titan with Intel

[Satish Balay]

On Fri, 8 May 2015, Ed D'Azevedo wrote:

> Is petsc using ACML specific routines?
> If not, perhaps MKL provides the lapack/blas and ACML is not needed?
> 
> Just a thought.

yup PETSc can use whatever blas/lapck user provides.

In this case PETSc was not seeking acml - but the 'module' env was
presumably setup with acml [and the compilers are attempting to use
these modules directly - irrespective of PETSc]

Satish