[petsc-users] When pull the petsc-dev for update:Connection timed out

[Jed Brown]

Sounds like you didn't "hg update" and had a bad mergetool or something.
You can use hg revert to discard any local changes. Since you have many
stale files around, you may want to use hg clean (this will delete all
untracked files!) to get back to a state like if you had a fresh clone.


On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 1:25 AM, Zhenglun (Alan) Wei <zhenglun.wei at gmail.com
> wrote:

>
>  On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Zhenglun (Alan) Wei <
> zhenglun.wei at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear Sean,
>>      Thank you so much for your help. Here I have another question.
>>      After updating the PETSc, I tried to 'make ex45' in
>> /src/ksp/ksp/example/tutorial/. It says that 'petscksp.h' can not be found;
>> therefore, I commented this library in ex45.c to see what will happen. It,
>> then, shows that the 'petscdmmg.h' can not be found. Any idea on this? :)
>>
>
>  Since DMMG is gone, baby gone, this means your environment (PETSC_DIR)
> is still pointing to an old version of PETSc.
>
>      Since my PETSc was updated, the PETSC_DIR of the new version of the
> PETSc should be the same as the old version of the PETSc, isn't it?
>      BTW, it works after I re-configure and make the PETSc. However, I
> found that it as a lot of dummy things in the ex45.c, i.e.:
> <<<<<<<<<<local
>
> ========
>
> >>>>>>>>>other
>
> =========
>
>      It seems that the update changes the original program of ex45.c by
> adding fractions of the new code into the old code. It confused me a lot.
> Is there any way that I can just replace the old code by the new code?
>
> thanks,
> Alan
>
>
>
>>
>> thanks,
>> Alan
>>
>>  On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Zhenglun (Alan) Wei
>>> <zhenglun.wei at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thank you Sean,
>>>>     I changed the
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> $ cd config/buildsystem
>>>> $ hg showconfig paths.default
>>>>     to
>>>> https://bitbucket.org/petsc/buildsystem
>>>>
>>>>    It gives me 2 extra changes.
>>>>
>>> Great! Glad to know it's working.
>>>
>>>       Although, it always giev me the warning of 'certificate not
>>>> verified',
>>>> it updated lots of files. Should I just ignore this warning?
>>>>
>>> You could ignore those warnings, yes, but it would probably be better
>>> to upgrade your mercurial and see if the host fingerprint option
>>> works. Or you could try to use the ssh protocol, assuming your
>>> university proxy allows ssh out.
>>>
>>>     BTW, the reason I used 'https' instead of 'http' is that 'https' is
>>>> shown
>>>> in the website you gave to me. :) It may needs to be changed.
>>>>
>>> Well, as I said previously, bitbucket redirects all http traffic to
>>> https, so I don't think changing it to just http would really work.
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20121126/3f51e158/attachment.html>