[petsc-users] Strange error(?) message

[Mohammad Mirzadeh]

Correct! That's what I thought :)

On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Jed Brown <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 12:08, Mohammad Mirzadeh <mirzadeh at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Humm. What I meant by contiguous is in terms of new global numberings.
>> That is for proc 0: [0, np0), for proc 1: [np0, np1), for proc 2: [np1,
>> np2) ..., for proc p-1: [ np-2, ntotal). I did not mean
>> (topologically) contiguous partitions. Is this not the case?
>>
>
> The global numbering produced by ISPartitioningToNumbering() is
> contiguous, but each part might not be topologically connected.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20120412/dad1ed86/attachment.htm>