[petsc-users] Mat_CheckInode

Hong Zhang hzhang at mcs.anl.gov
Mon Dec 5 09:34:39 CST 2011


For
>The matrix size is around 50000*50000, nnz is ~2000000

You may also try direct solver '-pc_type lu' either Petsc lu (sequential)
or mumps, or superlu_dist.
They may be faster than ilu(1).

Hong

On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Debao Shao <Debao.Shao at brion.com> wrote:
>>
>> DA,
>>
>> 1, Will check_inode affect the runtime performance? For example, in my
>> case, there are such different logs:
>>
>>      [0] Mat_CheckInode(): Found 18602 nodes out of 18609 rows. Not using
>> Inode routines
>>
>>      [0] Mat_CheckInode(): Found 0 nodes of 0. Limit used: 5. Using Inode
>> routines
>>
>>      [0] Mat_CheckInode(): Found 14020 nodes out of 14020 rows. Not using
>> Inode routines
>
>
> This is intended to "discover" block structure. If you have it, MatMult
> should be faster.
>
>>
>> 2, Here is the log_summary, looks like PCSetup is big time-consuming
>> function, the method I’m using is ILU(1) & GMRES, may I improve it?
>>
>>      MatMult            30733 1.0 8.9553e+01 1.0 3.41e+10 1.0 0.0e+00
>> 0.0e+00 0.0e+00  2  4  0  0  0   2  4  0  0  0   380
>>
>>      MatMultAdd          9552 1.0 6.6610e+00 1.0 2.42e+09 1.0 0.0e+00
>> 0.0e+00 0.0e+00  0  0  0  0  0   0  0  0  0  0   363
>>
>>      MatSolve           36236 1.0 2.4699e+02 1.0 9.44e+10 1.0 0.0e+00
>> 0.0e+00 0.0e+00  6 10  0  0  0   6 10  0  0  0   382
>>
>>      MatLUFactorNum      2838 1.0 2.4328e+03 1.0 7.65e+11 1.0 0.0e+00
>> 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 61 85  0  0  0  61 85  0  0  0   315
>>
>>      MatILUFactorSym      173 1.0 1.3486e+02 1.0 0.00e+00 0.0 0.0e+00
>> 0.0e+00 0.0e+00  3  0  0  0  0   3  0  0  0  0     0
>>
>>      MatAssemblyBegin    5787 1.0 2.0547e-03 1.0 0.00e+00 0.0 0.0e+00
>> 0.0e+00 0.0e+00  0  0  0  0  0   0  0  0  0  0     0
>>
>>      MatAssemblyEnd      5787 1.0 5.3559e+00 1.0 0.00e+00 0.0 0.0e+00
>> 0.0e+00 0.0e+00  0  0  0  0  0   0  0  0  0  0     0
>>
>>      KSPGMRESOrthog     30679 1.0 5.5968e+00 1.0 4.06e+09 1.0 0.0e+00
>> 0.0e+00 0.0e+00  0  0  0  0  0   0  0  0  0  0   725
>>
>>      KSPSetup            2838 1.0 1.8219e-02 1.0 0.00e+00 0.0 0.0e+00
>> 0.0e+00 0.0e+00  0  0  0  0  0   0  0  0  0  0     0
>>
>>      KSPSolve            5503 1.0 2.9136e+03 1.0 8.99e+11 1.0 0.0e+00
>> 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 73100  0  0  0  73100  0  0  0   308
>>
>>      PCSetUp             2838 1.0 2.5682e+03 1.0 7.65e+11 1.0 0.0e+00
>> 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 64 85  0  0  0  64 85  0  0  0   298
>>
>>      PCApply            36236 1.0 2.4709e+02 1.0 9.44e+10 1.0 0.0e+00
>> 0.0e+00 0.0e+00  6 10  0  0  0   6 10  0  0  0   382
>>
>> The matrix size is around 50000*50000, nnz is ~2000000
>
>
> ILU is expensive, and levels make it much more expensive. Maybe try AMG?
>>
>> 3, Will the fill of ilu affect the runtime performance?
>>
>>      [0] MatILUFactorSymbolic_SeqAIJ(): Reallocs 0 Fill ratio:given 1
>> needed 1.11111
>>
>>      [0] MatILUFactorSymbolic_SeqAIJ(): Reallocs 1 Fill ratio:given 1
>> needed 5.05
>>
>>      [0] MatILUFactorSymbolic_SeqAIJ(): Reallocs 1 Fill ratio:given 1
>> needed 8.3410
>>
>> How to set a proper value for fill, >8?
>
>
> http://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/petsc-dev/docs/manualpages/PC/PCFactorSetFill.html
>
> Use -pc_factor_fill
>
>   Matt
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Debao
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> -- The information contained in this communication and any attachments is
>> confidential and may be privileged, and is for the sole use of the intended
>> recipient(s). Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is
>> prohibited. Unless explicitly stated otherwise in the body of this
>> communication or the attachment thereto (if any), the information is
>> provided on an AS-IS basis without any express or implied warranties or
>> liabilities. To the extent you are relying on this information, you are
>> doing so at your own risk. If you are not the intended recipient, please
>> notify the sender immediately by replying to this message and destroy all
>> copies of this message and any attachments. ASML is neither liable for the
>> proper and complete transmission of the information contained in this
>> communication, nor for any delay in its receipt.
>
>
>
>
> --
> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments
> is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments
> lead.
> -- Norbert Wiener


More information about the petsc-users mailing list