[petsc-users] Mat_CheckInode
Matthew Knepley
knepley at gmail.com
Mon Dec 5 08:54:52 CST 2011
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Debao Shao <Debao.Shao at brion.com> wrote:
> DA,
>
> 1, Will check_inode affect the runtime performance? For example, in my
> case, there are such different logs:****
>
> [0] Mat_CheckInode(): Found 18602 nodes out of 18609 rows. Not using
> Inode routines****
>
> [0] Mat_CheckInode(): Found 0 nodes of 0. Limit used: 5. Using Inode
> routines****
>
> [0] Mat_CheckInode(): Found 14020 nodes out of 14020 rows. Not using
> Inode routines
>
This is intended to "discover" block structure. If you have it, MatMult
should be faster.
> 2, Here is the log_summary, looks like PCSetup is big time-consuming
> function, the method I’m using is ILU(1) & GMRES, may I improve it?****
>
> MatMult 30733 1.0 8.9553e+01 1.0 3.41e+10 1.0 0.0e+00
> 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 2 4 0 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 380****
>
> MatMultAdd 9552 1.0 6.6610e+00 1.0 2.42e+09 1.0 0.0e+00
> 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 363****
>
> MatSolve 36236 1.0 2.4699e+02 1.0 9.44e+10 1.0 0.0e+00
> 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 6 10 0 0 0 6 10 0 0 0 382****
>
> MatLUFactorNum 2838 1.0 2.4328e+03 1.0 7.65e+11 1.0 0.0e+00
> 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 61 85 0 0 0 61 85 0 0 0 315****
>
> MatILUFactorSym 173 1.0 1.3486e+02 1.0 0.00e+00 0.0 0.0e+00
> 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0****
>
> MatAssemblyBegin 5787 1.0 2.0547e-03 1.0 0.00e+00 0.0 0.0e+00
> 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0****
>
> MatAssemblyEnd 5787 1.0 5.3559e+00 1.0 0.00e+00 0.0 0.0e+00
> 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0****
>
> KSPGMRESOrthog 30679 1.0 5.5968e+00 1.0 4.06e+09 1.0 0.0e+00
> 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 725****
>
> KSPSetup 2838 1.0 1.8219e-02 1.0 0.00e+00 0.0 0.0e+00
> 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0****
>
> KSPSolve 5503 1.0 2.9136e+03 1.0 8.99e+11 1.0 0.0e+00
> 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 73100 0 0 0 73100 0 0 0 308****
>
> PCSetUp 2838 1.0 2.5682e+03 1.0 7.65e+11 1.0 0.0e+00
> 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 64 85 0 0 0 64 85 0 0 0 298****
>
> PCApply 36236 1.0 2.4709e+02 1.0 9.44e+10 1.0 0.0e+00
> 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 6 10 0 0 0 6 10 0 0 0 382 ****
>
> The matrix size is around 50000*50000, nnz is ~2000000
>
ILU is expensive, and levels make it much more expensive. Maybe try AMG?
> 3, Will the fill of ilu affect the runtime performance?****
>
> [0] MatILUFactorSymbolic_SeqAIJ(): Reallocs 0 Fill ratio:given 1
> needed 1.11111****
>
> [0] MatILUFactorSymbolic_SeqAIJ(): Reallocs 1 Fill ratio:given 1
> needed 5.05****
>
> [0] MatILUFactorSymbolic_SeqAIJ(): Reallocs 1 Fill ratio:given 1
> needed 8.3410****
>
> How to set a proper value for fill, >8?
>
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/petsc-dev/docs/manualpages/PC/PCFactorSetFill.html
Use -pc_factor_fill
Matt
> Thanks,****
>
> Debao****
>
> ------------------------------
> -- The information contained in this communication and any attachments is
> confidential and may be privileged, and is for the sole use of the intended
> recipient(s). Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is
> prohibited. Unless explicitly stated otherwise in the body of this
> communication or the attachment thereto (if any), the information is
> provided on an AS-IS basis without any express or implied warranties or
> liabilities. To the extent you are relying on this information, you are
> doing so at your own risk. If you are not the intended recipient, please
> notify the sender immediately by replying to this message and destroy all
> copies of this message and any attachments. ASML is neither liable for the
> proper and complete transmission of the information contained in this
> communication, nor for any delay in its receipt.
>
--
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20111205/4d27182b/attachment.htm>
More information about the petsc-users
mailing list