****MJ-REJECTED**** RE: Non repetability issue and difference between 2.3.0 and 2.3.3

[Barry Smith]

   .zip files are automatically destroyed by our SPAM blocker. Please  
send a compressed tar file
or something similar to petsc-maint at mcs.anl.gov


On Sep 26, 2008, at 11:31 AM, Matthew Knepley wrote:

> Shoot, I am looking through my mail but cannot find it. Can you send
> it to petsc-maint?
>
>  Thanks,
>
>     Matt
>
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 1:23 AM, Etienne PERCHAT
> <etienne.perchat at transvalor.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Matt,
>>
>> I don't understand. I thought that what I've  send to you in .zip  
>> file contained all the required information.
>>
>> Did you received it ?
>>
>> I used MatView and VecView within a PetscViewer created with  
>> PetscViewerASCIIOpen(PETSC_COMM_WORLD, NomVec, &writer);
>> Does it contains all the require information or do you need  
>> something more?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Etienne
>>
>> PS: I would like to stress that we are using PetSc since quite a  
>> long time that it works WONDERFULLY well and that we are fully  
>> satisfied and really grateful to have the opportunity of using it.
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Message d'origine-----
>> De : owner-petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov [mailto:owner-petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov 
>> ] De la part de Matthew Knepley
>> Envoyé : jeudi 25 septembre 2008 21:06
>> À : petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov
>> Objet : Re: ****MJ-REJECTED**** RE: Non repetability issue and  
>> difference between 2.3.0 and 2.3.3
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Etienne PERCHAT
>> <etienne.perchat at transvalor.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Barry,
>>>
>>> yes we are in mpich2 1.0.2p1.
>>
>> As before, we really need to see the system and rhs, or the whole  
>> code.
>>
>> Matt
>>
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which
> their experiments lead.
> -- Norbert Wiener
>