****MJ-REJECTED**** RE: Non repetability issue and difference between 2.3.0 and 2.3.3

Matthew Knepley knepley at gmail.com
Fri Sep 26 11:31:54 CDT 2008


Shoot, I am looking through my mail but cannot find it. Can you send
it to petsc-maint?

  Thanks,

     Matt

On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 1:23 AM, Etienne PERCHAT
<etienne.perchat at transvalor.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Matt,
>
> I don't understand. I thought that what I've  send to you in .zip file contained all the required information.
>
> Did you received it ?
>
> I used MatView and VecView within a PetscViewer created with PetscViewerASCIIOpen(PETSC_COMM_WORLD, NomVec, &writer);
> Does it contains all the require information or do you need something more?
>
> Thanks,
> Etienne
>
> PS: I would like to stress that we are using PetSc since quite a long time that it works WONDERFULLY well and that we are fully satisfied and really grateful to have the opportunity of using it.
>
>
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : owner-petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov [mailto:owner-petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov] De la part de Matthew Knepley
> Envoyé : jeudi 25 septembre 2008 21:06
> À : petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov
> Objet : Re: ****MJ-REJECTED**** RE: Non repetability issue and difference between 2.3.0 and 2.3.3
>
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Etienne PERCHAT
> <etienne.perchat at transvalor.com> wrote:
>> Hi Barry,
>>
>> yes we are in mpich2 1.0.2p1.
>
> As before, we really need to see the system and rhs, or the whole code.
>
>  Matt
>
>



-- 
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which
their experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener




More information about the petsc-users mailing list