[Petsc-trilinos-discussion] Scope and requirements

Jed Brown jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov
Mon Nov 25 09:49:51 CST 2013


"Bartlett, Roscoe A." <bartlettra at ornl.gov> writes:

> I just remembered that we did have a verbal conversation with the
> Hydra-TH developers about 6 months or so ago about upgrading PETSc and
> they claimed that they could not upgrade because PETSc changed the
> behavior of one of their iterative solvers in such a way as to have
> "broken" the solver (at least from their perspective).  

A default might have changed, but the old configuration should still be
available with runtime options (or changing defaults in user code).

> I assumed that they had discussed this with someone on the PETSc team
> about change in behavior but I guess they did not (or if they did they
> did not use the name "Hydra-TH" or something).  

Not that we know of.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-trilinos-discussion/attachments/20131125/f7c55937/attachment.pgp>


More information about the Petsc-trilinos-discussion mailing list