[petsc-dev] Mat test ex238

[Barry Smith]

  Ready for approvals

  https://gitlab.com/petsc/petsc/-/merge_requests/4010

> On May 19, 2021, at 6:19 AM, Stefano Zampini <stefano.zampini at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> +1
> The help says for timing tests, but it makes no sense to me for them being part of the entire CI
> We should probably have a dedicated runner for performance regressions (running only performance runs, something like requires: performance)
> Not sure why the sizes are so large, probably Barry wants to check for overflows somewhere?
> 
> 
> 
> Il giorno mer 19 mag 2021 alle ore 14:12 Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com <mailto:knepley at gmail.com>> ha scritto:
> This is taking hundreds of seconds in every run. For the CI, shouldn't we reduce the size of the matrix, maybe to 5000 instead of 50000?
> 
>   Thanks,
> 
>       Matt
> 
> -- 
> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead.
> -- Norbert Wiener
> 
> https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ <http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/>
> 
> 
> -- 
> Stefano

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20210521/52e21bd2/attachment.html>