[petsc-dev] gcc 10

[Mark Adams]

On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 1:40 PM Jed Brown <jed at jedbrown.org> wrote:

> I don't know what failure you're referring to.  The C++ complex thing
> might have been a matter of the antique compiler.
>

The failure was fixed with -fallow_ .... but it gave warnings.


>
> Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Why did Mark have the gcc 10 failure on our example. Was it something
> with
> > did in it?
> >
> >    Matt
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 12:43 PM Jed Brown <jed at jedbrown.org> wrote:
> >
> >> You want this for PETSc or for external packages?  We add it for a bunch
> >> of external packages.  I've been building PETSc with gcc/gfortran-10 for
> >> months now.
> >>
> >> Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> writes:
> >>
> >> > Do we have gfortran from gcc 10 running anywhere? We need a check to
> >> enable
> >> >
> >> >   -fallow-argument-mismatch
> >> >
> >> > from configure. Should be as simple as compiling Fortran which has
> >> > PetscObjectSetName() in it.
> >> >
> >> >   Thanks,
> >> >
> >> >       Matt
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
> >> > experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which
> >> their
> >> > experiments lead.
> >> > -- Norbert Wiener
> >> >
> >> > https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ <
> >> http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
> > experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which
> their
> > experiments lead.
> > -- Norbert Wiener
> >
> > https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ <
> http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20200713/2652f873/attachment.html>