[petsc-dev] new Fortran error
Barry Smith
bsmith at petsc.dev
Fri Jul 10 14:37:32 CDT 2020
The fix for this is to add PetscObjectSetName() to src/sys/f90-mod/petscsys.h90 with the * notation to allow any type. You will see in that file PetscObjectReference() etc.
PetsFE is an INTEGER(8) in Fortran because no one has updated it yet to be a Fortran type. You will see in include/petsc/finclude/petscdm.h that only DM has be properly updated to be a Fortran type, a bunch of others are still treated as integers and need to be fixed eventually.
#define DM type(tDM)
#define DMAdaptor PetscFortranAddr
#define PetscQuadrature PetscFortranAddr
#define PetscDS PetscFortranAddr
#define PetscFE PetscFortranAddr
#define PetscSpace PetscFortranAddr
#define PetscDualSpace PetscFortranAddr
#define PetscFV PetscFortranAddr
#define PetscLimiter PetscFortranAddr
#define PetscPartitioner PetscFortranAddr
#define DMField PetscFortranAddr
> On Jul 10, 2020, at 9:57 AM, Mark Adams <mfadams at lbl.gov> wrote:
>
>
> I suspect you have upgraded gfortran and now have gfortran version 10,
>
> 09:35 knepley/feature-swarm-fortran= ~/Codes/petsc$ mpif90 --version
> GNU Fortran (Homebrew GCC 10.1.0) 10.1.0
>
> which is pickier about argument matching.
>
> If you add -fallow-argument-mismatch to the fortran flags, do things go away?
>
>
> Well, it turns 6 errors into 2 warnings:
>
> FC arch-macosx-gnu-g/tests/dm/impls/swarm/tutorials/ex1f90.o
> /Users/markadams/Codes/petsc/src/dm/impls/swarm/tutorials/ex1f90.F90:39:30:
>
> 34 | call PetscObjectSetName(dm, 'Potential Grid', ierr);CHKERRA(ierr)
> | 2
> ......
> 39 | call PetscObjectSetName(fe, 'fe', ierr);CHKERRA(ierr)
> | 1
> Warning: Type mismatch between actual argument at (1) and actual argument at (2) (INTEGER(8)/TYPE(tdm)).
> FLINKER arch-macosx-gnu-g/tests/dm/impls/swarm/tutorials/ex1f90
> TEST arch-macosx-gnu-g/tests/counts/dm_impls_swarm_tutorials-ex1f90_0.counts
> ok dm_impls_swarm_tutorials-ex1f90_0
> ok diff-dm_impls_swarm_tutorials-ex1f90_0
>
> Oh well, I guess we need to add this param if we want to set names and take it out of regression tests.
>
> I wonder why it seems to say a PetsFE is an INTEGER(8) ...
>
> Thanks,
> Mark
>
> Lawrenmce
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20200710/29112b3b/attachment.html>
More information about the petsc-dev
mailing list