[petsc-dev] [Suggestion] Configure QOL Improvements

Nathan Collier nathaniel.collier at gmail.com
Wed Oct 23 16:08:12 CDT 2019

In the interim, I can suggest that once you have something working that you
like, then upload:


as a GIST on github or something similar. Cannot tell you how many times I
have blown away my old reconfigure file by accident and had to figure it
out again.


On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 5:00 PM Jed Brown via petsc-dev <
petsc-dev at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:

> Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> writes:
> > That is an unreliable check for Z. You would not eliminate the case
> > where you give --with-Z, but the check fails, so Z is not available,
> > but you do not find out until checking X or Y.
> You can verify that Z works in a fraction of a second, but building X
> may take minutes.  Work bottom up, verify everything that is given
> before building anything.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20191023/77cf0a14/attachment.html>

More information about the petsc-dev mailing list