[petsc-dev] [Suggestion] Configure QOL Improvements
Faibussowitsch, Jacob
jfaibussowitsch at anl.gov
Wed Oct 23 16:08:24 CDT 2019
I think Jed is referring to the fact that configure appears to do all of these checks after doing the compiler, MPI, MathEnv, etc which take a long time. The change would be to check missing external library dependencies before even doing the compiler checks.
Best,
Jacob
On Oct 23, 2019, at 4:03 PM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com<mailto:knepley at gmail.com>> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 4:59 PM Jed Brown <jed at jedbrown.org<mailto:jed at jedbrown.org>> wrote:
Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com<mailto:knepley at gmail.com>> writes:
> That is an unreliable check for Z. You would not eliminate the case
> where you give --with-Z, but the check fails, so Z is not available,
> but you do not find out until checking X or Y.
You can verify that Z works in a fraction of a second, but building X
may take minutes. Work bottom up, verify everything that is given
before building anything.
That is exactly what we do now. What are you talking about?
Matt
--
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/<http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20191023/bbf104c7/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the petsc-dev
mailing list