[petsc-dev] Would this make sense?

[Matthew Knepley]

On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 2:31 PM Jed Brown <jed at jedbrown.org> wrote:

> Matthew Knepley via petsc-dev <petsc-dev at mcs.anl.gov> writes:
>
> >
> https://ford-foundation-6.forms.fm/digital-infrastructure-research-rfp/forms/4770
>
> "Submissions were due on Jun 13, 2018 at 9:59pm."
>
> > Perhaps we would get funds to
> >
> >   1) Cloudize our usage, along the lines Jed has been going
> >
> >   2) Harden the automatic testing infrastructure, maybe incorporate
> > performance regression
> >
> >   3) Bring the tutorials infrastructure into the 21st century
>
> GSoC could be appropriate.  The big issue is people.  Most developers
> here are not intrinsically motivated by devops, and people with devops
> expertise can make real money so what makes devops for PETSc more
> interesting than devops in any other setting?
>

The problems are much cooler than cat pictures?

   Matt

-- 
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener

https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ <http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20190401/b87f7cec/attachment.html>