[petsc-dev] Install location for MPIUNI mpi.h

[Jed Brown]

Looks good to me, so pulled into my branch.

Satish Balay <balay at mcs.anl.gov> writes:

> I have the following changes in balay/mpiuni-include/jed
>
> - mpi.mod -> mpiuni.mod 
>
> - remove -Iinclde/petsc/mpiuni
>
> If ok - they can be pulled into jed/mpiuni-include/maint
>
> Satish
>
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2018, Satish Balay wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 25 Apr 2018, Jed Brown wrote:
>> 
>> > Bitbucket keeps saying "Something went wrong while creating your pull
>> > request." but you can look at the branch
>> > 
>> > https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc/branch/jed/mpiuni-include/maint
>> > 
>> > @balay Can we simply remove the MPIUNI includes from MPI.py or should we
>> > remove it later?
>> 
>> Best to remove now - to check if there are issues?
>> 
>> also Fix mpif.h usage code?
>> 
>> There is also mpi.mod - that might need renaming [to comply with not installing in /usr/include?]
>> 
>> So rename to mpiuni.mod? [and rename mpi.h to mpiuni.h etc?]
>> 
>> 
>> Looks like this change is more of a 'master change'..
>> 
>> 
>> >  What --download packages are supported when using
>> > MPIUNI?  I don't see any examples.
>> 
>> Yeah - our tests are basic here. I don't remember if any externalpackages compiled with mpiuni
>> 
>> Satish
>>