[petsc-dev] My configure is non-working again because of CMake

[Matthew Knepley]

On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 5:36 PM Jed Brown <jed at jedbrown.org> wrote:

> Matt, you're gonna have to upgrade your compiler eventually.  You can
> postpone it a few months or perhaps a year.
>

In a year, I will buy a new machine.

  Matt


> Satish Balay <balay at mcs.anl.gov> writes:
>
> > Well - can you find the version between 3.7 and 3.11 that works on your
> box?
> >
> > The previous update was done due to:
> > https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc/commits/e5b329dd4ac
> >
> > No point in going back to having old issues..
> >
> > Satish
> >
> > On Thu, 5 Jul 2018, Matthew Knepley wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 5:18 PM Satish Balay <balay at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Logs?
> >> >
> >>
> >> I can send it, but its really straightforward. The clang++/g++ on my box
> >> (which I will not upgrade because the latest MacOS is crazy)
> >> does not have the <unorderedset> header, and thus is not compliant
> C++11.
> >>
> >>
> >> > And what version of cmake does not require C++11 compliant compiler?
> We
> >> > could downgrade to that..
> >> >
> >>
> >> I reverted back to 3.7 which worked, so somewhere in between 3.7 and
> 3.11
> >> they made the change.
> >>
> >>   Thanks,
> >>
> >>     Matt
> >>
> >>
> >> > Satish
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, 5 Jul 2018, Matthew Knepley wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Now we require a fully C++11 compliant compiler, or the CMake build
> dies.
> >> > > This is crazy.
> >> > >
> >> > >    Matt
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
>


-- 
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener

https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ <http://www.caam.rice.edu/~mk51/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20180705/ac4208a6/attachment-0001.html>