[petsc-dev] transition to GitHub

[Sean Farley]

Smith, Barry F. <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> writes:

>    Jed (and others)
>
>       What do you recommend as the least painful way to move the PETSc repository and all its issues, etc over to GitHub?
>
>      Thanks
>         Barry
>
>
> One more time of dealing with Bitbucket's cumbersome way to merge/update other users pull requests into PETSc and I think it will be time.

I'm a bit behind on email so I missed this initially. FWIW, we have
plans to implement a different model but as with everything bureaucratic
it's been a lower priority than implementing GDPR. I agree that missing
PR refs is one of the biggest sore points on Bitbucket.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 832 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20180128/cb2002df/attachment.sig>