[petsc-dev] configure issues with new MKL and --with-mkl_sparse_optimize=0

[Mills, Richard Tran]

Sorry, everyone, for how long it took me to have time to get back to this. I tried the change I suggested in my previous message, but configure fails with

*******************************************************************************
         UNABLE to CONFIGURE with GIVEN OPTIONS    (see configure.log for details):
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Did not find package MKL_SPARSE_OPTIMIZE needed by mkl_sparse_sp2m.
Enable the package using --with-mkl_sparse_optimize
*******************************************************************************

Does this happen because I have specified that this is a "look for by default" package? What I'd like to happen is that this package be looked for my default, in fact, but if MKL_SPARSE_OPTIMIZE is not present or disabled, then I'd like the test for mkl_sparse_sp2m to fail gracefully and configure to continue. That is: I don't want the fact that I am looking for this package automatically to imply that it HAS to be there. Is there any easy way to get this behavior?

--Richard

On 11/27/18 2:15 PM, Smith, Barry F. wrote:





On Nov 26, 2018, at 6:12 PM, Mills, Richard Tran via petsc-dev <petsc-dev at mcs.anl.gov><mailto:petsc-dev at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:

Hi Stefano,

Apologies for the slow reply; I was out for the US Thanksgiving Holiday.

You've found an error in the logic for the MKL configure tests: Your MKL does indeed have mkl_sparse_sp2m(), but since this depends on having mkl_sparse_optimize() and you have specified '--with-mkl_sparse_optimize=0', PETSC_HAVE_MKL_SPARSE_SP2M either ought to not be defined, or in my AIJMKL code I should only enable the SP2M code if PETSC_HAVE_MKL_SPARSE_OPTIMIZE is defined. I think I like the former option better. For those more familiar with BuildSystem than I am, I think I can do this by putting the following in setupDependencies() in mkl_sparse_sp2m.py:

    self.mkl_sparse_optimize  = framework.require('config.packages.mkl_sparse_optimize', self)
    self.deps                           = [self.blasLapack,self.mkl_sparse_optimize]



    Looks ok to me. Make a pull request with Satish as a reviewer.

   Barry




Is that all that is required?

--Richard

On 11/21/18 10:59 PM, Stefano Zampini wrote:


Richard,

I just noticed that PETSc master does not build with the options

    '--with-mkl_pardiso-dir=/soft/com/packages/intel/18/u3/mkl',
    '--with-mkl_sparse_optimize=0',

This is on frog at MCS, but it will be the same on other machines as the macros configuration

PETSC_HAVE_MKL_SPARSE_OPTIMIZE not defined
PETSC_HAVE_MKL_SPARSE_SP2M defined

does not seem to be supported.

/nfs2/szampini/src/petsc/src/mat/impls/aij/seq/aijmkl/aijmkl.c(797): error: struct "<unnamed>" has no field "csrA"
    csrA = a->csrA;

Could you please take a look? Why is the mkl_sparse_sp2m package flagged as lookforbydefault in the configure scripts?

Thanks
--
Stefano








-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20181204/dc51b34c/attachment.html>