[petsc-dev] mpifort versus mpif90

[Jed Brown]

We only need one FC now and the preferred executable name is mpifort
(other variants like mpif90 are deprecated in both MPICH and Open MPI).
I would just add this everywhere we currently have mpif90 but the code
is already super convoluted and I'd rather simplify if possible.  Does
anyone use --with-gnu-compilers versus --with-vendor-compilers?  Is it
tested anywhere?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 832 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20170603/06cbd9a2/attachment.sig>