[petsc-dev] pnetcdf is a big problem
Smith, Barry F.
bsmith at mcs.anl.gov
Tue Dec 19 17:32:39 CST 2017
> On Dec 19, 2017, at 5:30 PM, Jed Brown <jed at jedbrown.org> wrote:
>
> Does ExodusII write pnetcdf? It's a different interface from (parallel)
> NetCDF4.
Shudder!
>
> Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Blaise really wants to write in parallel. It would be better to use HDF5,
>> but evidently
>> it is broken in ExodusII. Thats what we get for using something from
>> Sandia. They
>> finally have their revenge.
>>
>> Matt
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 5:53 PM, Smith, Barry F. <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Do you really need to use pnetcdf? No one uses it and what usefulness
>>> does it really provide, best to be avoided.
>>>
>>> Barry
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Dec 19, 2017, at 1:12 PM, Satish Balay <balay at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> parallel-netcdf-1.9.0.pre1/INSTALL has:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 4. Reporting Installation or Usage Problems
>>>> ===========================================
>>>>
>>>> Please send an email to parallel-netcdf at mcs.anl.gov
>>>>
>>>> <<<<<<
>>>>
>>>> We'll have to send in these bug reports.
>>>>
>>>> Satish
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, 19 Dec 2017, Matthew Knepley wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The configure is broken, perhaps beyond fixing. I need to give
>>> --with-mpi
>>>>> to get anything
>>>>> to work because the way it checks for MPI is screwed up. I will see if I
>>>>> can throw away all its idiotic configure stuff in favor of just telling
>>> it
>>>>> everything, but I am not eager to depend on something so rickety.
>>>>>
>>>>> Matt
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
>> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
>> experiments lead.
>> -- Norbert Wiener
>>
>> https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ <http://www.caam.rice.edu/~mk51/>
More information about the petsc-dev
mailing list