[petsc-dev] Bug in MatShift_MPIAIJ ?

Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov
Wed Oct 21 14:02:07 CDT 2015


> On Oct 21, 2015, at 1:54 PM, Eric Chamberland <Eric.Chamberland at giref.ulaval.ca> wrote:
> 
> On 21/10/15 02:21 PM, Barry Smith wrote:
>>   Thanks. I don't think I need the Icount but. I think I can just generate an error if the FILE and LINE don't match exactly?
> 
> Barry, I highly recommend you to use the static counter too otherwise you won't catch the following bug:
> 
> if all processes should call "n" times the same line of code (then the same __LINE__ and __FILE__) but one process do not make the right number of call...

   I don't understand. 

   Say one process called it one less time then the rest. Then during the next call to MPI_Allreduce by the rogue process it will have a different LINE and FILE from the others (since they will still be at the previous call site)  and hence the macro will generate an error message since line and file won't match.  What is wrong with my reasoning?

  Barry

> 
> Also, it is not a big deal to have this static value in a function, so it shouldn't be a big issue...
> 
> Eric
> 




More information about the petsc-dev mailing list