[petsc-dev] "pure" subset of operators

[Matthew Knepley]

On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:48 AM, Marco Zocca <zocca.marco at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
> is there an index of the PETSc operations (e.g. mathematical on Vec's
> and Mat's) that do NOT overwrite the operands?
> I understand in-place operations are more efficient, but they make it
> harder to reason about the program's operation.
>

We do not make a separate list of these.

  Thanks,

     Matt


> Thank you in advance
>



-- 
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20150624/3ee92eae/attachment.html>