[petsc-dev] [PETSc checkBuilds] PETSc blame digest (next) 2015-08-24

[Jed Brown]

Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> writes:
> Oh, this is different I think. The /*@C was accidentally removed so a
> Fortran
> interface leaked through that should not have.

It's the same as changing or removing the Fortran function.  You could
imagine a system that tried to detect incomplete API changes and that
might fail if it didn't understand the generator, but we're not there
yet in this case.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 818 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20150824/caceb503/attachment.sig>