[petsc-dev] does next model mess up our histories

[Barry Smith]

On Oct 2, 2014, at 11:23 AM, Jed Brown <jed at jedbrown.org> wrote:

> Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> writes:
> 
>>  Sure, but this means we need a “test if I broke everything” infrastructure in addition to next.  Either running nightly or “continuous integration”
>> 
>>   Maybe we should start designing a “continuous integration” capability right now.
> 
> Yeah, we need to start with a better test infrastructure (fewer false
> positives, tabulating results, and executing faster).  Once that works,
> we can do CI.

   I disagree. We should start a CI tester now and then work on that stuff.

   We can start with CI tester that only runs on a couple of machines