[petsc-dev] does next model mess up our histories

[Jed Brown]

Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> writes:

>   Sure, but this means we need a “test if I broke everything” infrastructure in addition to next.  Either running nightly or “continuous integration”
>
>    Maybe we should start designing a “continuous integration” capability right now.

Yeah, we need to start with a better test infrastructure (fewer false
positives, tabulating results, and executing faster).  Once that works,
we can do CI.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 818 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20141002/640918bf/attachment.sig>