[petsc-dev] getting ready for PETSc release
Barry Smith
bsmith at mcs.anl.gov
Sun Jun 8 17:22:37 CDT 2014
On Jun 8, 2014, at 5:10 PM, Jed Brown <jed at jedbrown.org> wrote:
> Blaise A Bourdin <bourdin at lsu.edu> writes:
>>> We’ve been over a year since a release which is too long.
>>
>> That’s fair.
>>
>> As a matter of fact, if the releases are not as far apart, skipping one is not a big deal.
>
> I think we should move to a faster release schedule. At least once
> every six months from here out.
You’ve been advocating this for a while and I don’t disagree; so why hasn’t it worked out? Do we really have to state publicly a release date and then force it upon ourselves to make these regular releases? Is it worth it? I’m just asking, I’m not opposing.
Barry
> Releases are easier that way and there
> would be less motivation to try to cram more features in before a
> deadline. Though this means that a somewhat higher fraction of users
> might have an older version of PETSc (and it might be worth our while to
> do bug fixes against an older 'maint').
More information about the petsc-dev
mailing list