[petsc-dev] git workflow question
Dominic Meiser
dmeiser at txcorp.com
Mon Jul 21 09:07:07 CDT 2014
On 07/19/2014 02:15 AM, Karl Rupp wrote:
> Hey,
>
> >> Note that 'dmeiser/fix-cusp-bjacobi' has somewhat tangled merge
> history,
>>> so if you are going to clean it up, you should do that before
>>> starting a
>>> new branch. (I don't really care in this case; keeping clean topic
>>> branches gets easier with practice.)
>> I created a mess with upstream merges because I didn't appreciate the
>> consequences. I read up on this and things are much clearer now. I know
>> that fix-cusp-bjacobi doesn't merge into master without conflicts at
>> this point (the ill conceived upstream merges were an attempt to resolve
>> the conflicts in the branch). Would the best way to clean things up be
>> to recreate the branch off of master? Karl, would this mess with your
>> testing/reviewing of this branch?
>
> Actually, I think we doing ourselves a favor if we recreate the branch
> from the current master, possibly after merging the removal of the
> "#ifdef 0"-stuff. Is that okay with you?
That sounds great to me. I have a few things on my plate this morning
but I hope to get to it this afternoon.
Cheers,
Dominic
>
> Best regards,
> Karli
>
--
Dominic Meiser
Tech-X Corporation
5621 Arapahoe Avenue
Boulder, CO 80303
USA
Telephone: 303-996-2036
Fax: 303-448-7756
www.txcorp.com
More information about the petsc-dev
mailing list