[petsc-dev] Matt, please don't put buggy code into PETSc

[Matthew Knepley]

On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 7:20 AM, Jed Brown <jed at jedbrown.org> wrote:

> Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> writes:
> >> This will be fixed when we have one command to compile all examples into
> >> one executable.  Should I merge the branch that does that now instead of
> >> holding off until we can run the test suite that way?  I think there is
> >> value in just having the compiler check all the examples.
>
> Should I do this?
>

definitely. I thought it worked now. I think we need a way to look at
example
compiles along with the main build.

  Matt

-- 
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20140120/f0b3abda/attachment.html>