[petsc-dev] Matt, please don't put buggy code into PETSc

[Jed Brown]

Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> writes:
>> This will be fixed when we have one command to compile all examples into
>> one executable.  Should I merge the branch that does that now instead of
>> holding off until we can run the test suite that way?  I think there is
>> value in just having the compiler check all the examples.

Should I do this?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20140120/a46ea580/attachment.sig>