[petsc-dev] Matt, please don't put buggy code into PETSc
Matthew Knepley
knepley at gmail.com
Sun Jan 19 18:13:03 CST 2014
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>
> src/mat/examples/tests/ex18.c
>
> passes a PetscScalar to VecNorm.
>
I missed it when I went over the example, and C does not check typedefs,
only
the underlying type.
> When the hell are we going to have some simple checks on bad code being
> pushed in petsc?
I checked the compiles every day, but not the examples since there is so
much noise. So
a) we could lump the example compiles in with the build. I like this one
b) we can cleanup all the example noise. I have started this, but it is a
big job.
Matt
>
> Barry
>
>
--
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20140119/d0c054ee/attachment.html>
More information about the petsc-dev
mailing list