[petsc-dev] CheckPointer

[Jed Brown]

What about a run-time option to enable it?

What is the actual overhead for an application that calls MatSetValues with
fine granularity?
On Sep 11, 2013 6:13 AM, "Matthew Knepley" <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:

> The new CheckPointer() is 1000s of times slower than the previous. We may
> want to have a configure option to disable it.
>
> I am not convinced, since the only function that it really matters for is
> MatSetValues(), which is a problematic interface function.
>
>    Matt
>
> --
> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
> experiments lead.
> -- Norbert Wiener
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20130911/3dddbb1d/attachment.html>