[petsc-dev] [Bitbucket] Pull request #109: Added at test, simplified version of ex11, convergence test. Uses differencing to produce matrix in stand alone code, fixed SNES to support this. (petsc/petsc)

Mark F. Adams mfadams at lbl.gov
Thu Oct 24 11:35:55 CDT 2013


I am trying to rebase -i, where I squashed one commit message, and get this error:

12:31 madams/sr-driver2 ~/Codes/petsc$ git pull
Merge made by the 'recursive' strategy.
12:31 madams/sr-driver2 ~/Codes/petsc$ git rebase -i HEAD~10
[detached HEAD 319baff] TS ex32: Added a parallel test
 Author: Matthew G. Knepley <knepley at gmail.com>
 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
The previous cherry-pick is now empty, possibly due to conflict resolution.
If you wish to commit it anyway, use:

    git commit --allow-empty

Otherwise, please use 'git reset'
# rebase in progress; onto a704522
# You are currently rebasing branch 'madams/sr-driver2' on 'a704522'.
#   (all conflicts fixed: run "git rebase --continue")
#



On Oct 24, 2013, at 11:31 AM, Jed Brown <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:

> @madams This branch is totally unreviewable in its current form, and
> it cannot be bisected because many of the intermediate states are
> broken.  I understand making haphazard/checkpoint commits while
> developing, but to maintain reviewability and quality in the long term,
> it's important to organize the commits so that they can be understood in
> sequence.  Commit messages like "...", "temp version", and "cleaning up"
> force the reviewer to read the commit in its entirety to have any idea
> what it is supposed to accomplish.  This makes it difficult to keep
> track of what is happening, which discourages people from following
> development, avoiding duplicate/conflicting work, etc.
> 
> We have to support everything that goes into PETSc, but if we can't
> follow development, we give outdated advice and end up unable to answer
> questions.
> 
> Most people working on PETSc are organizing their commits to be
> reviewable these days.  We can go to the commit and branch lists (in the
> web interface or with Git locally) and the first line of the commit
> message gives a good summary of what the commit is accomplishing, the
> body of the commit message explains why it is important/who may be
> impacted by the change, and the commit itself accomplishes something
> that the viewer can check.  This allows other developers to quickly get
> the gist of what is in a branch, what may be interesting to look at in
> more detail, etc.
> 
> Commit topology and messages are key means by which developers
> communicate with each other.  It really doesn't take much effort once
> you get in the habit of organizing commits as a means of communication
> rather than as a log with arbitrary checkpoints.
> 
> Any other means of communication, such as pull request summaries or
> mailing list threads, are secondary sources, inherently more error-prone
> and higher effort to evaluate, and provide less structure for automated
> diagnostics/summaries.
> 
> https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc/wiki/writing-commit-messages
> 
> Git provides good tools for reordering/squashing/amending commits, so
> it's possible to develop in clutter and then organize when it's time to
> communicate to other people.
> 
> 
> This PR is blocked on some of Matt's long-running branches.  @knepley
> When will 'knepley/feature-dmda-section' and
> 'knepley/feature-plex-refine-3d' be ready to merge?
> 
> Mark Adams <pullrequests-reply at bitbucket.org> writes:
> 
>> --- you can reply above this line ---
>> 
>> A new pull request has been opened by Mark Adams.
>> 
>> madams/sr-driver2 has changes to be pulled into master.
>> 
>> https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc/pull-request/109/added-at-test-simplified-version-of-ex11
>> 
>> Title: Added at test, simplified version of ex11, convergence test.  Uses differencing to produce matrix in stand alone code, fixed SNES to support this.
>> 
>> Changes to be pulled:
>> 
>> c1fa6a8934f2 by Mark Adams: "cleanup jed's cherry picked version"
>> e7b0c4510d02 by Jed Brown: "Merge branch 'knepley/fix-plex-ghost-cells' into jed/sr-driver
>> 
>> DMLabelFilter is…"
>> c56f055af68b by Mark Adams: "finished up adding serial DMPlex test with a convergance test on a 5-point Lapla…"
>> 8fdc87fb42d2 by Mark Adams: "cleaning up"
>> 0fb202fbc65d by Mark Adams: "cleaning up
>> 
>> Conflicts:
>> 	src/ts/examples/tutorials/makefile"
>> ... and 112 more.
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> Unsubscribe from pull request emails for this repository.
>> https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc/pull-request/109/unsubscribe/jedbrown/bc8a9c9283892888c102096c5dadc4a6a692a4fe/




More information about the petsc-dev mailing list