[petsc-dev] PetscFEM routines missing user data arguments

[Jed Brown]

Geoffrey Irving <irving at naml.us> writes:

> It doesn't look like there's currently a way to pass user data down to
> the various fields in PetscFEM.  Can I add an extra argument to each
> function, or is that part of the API going to change in a way that
> would obviate the extra argument?

I want a completely different (higher level) API and I think I'll have
time now that my proposal went in, but I think I asked Matt for a
context parameter something like a year ago.  I forget why he didn't
want to add it.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20131114/209e02a2/attachment.sig>