[petsc-dev] [mpich-discuss] MPICH migration to git

[Dmitry Karpeev]

My summary would be that
1. Git's ui is bad
2. There is the crappy index thingie
3.  I don't see how git branches are better than hg bookmarks (again, the
ui is bad).
4. I still use multiple repos along with branches in git.
5. I am willing to bet money Satish will use multiple repos, rather than
branches.
On Jan 9, 2013 10:12 PM, "Dmitry Karpeev" <karpeev at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On Jan 9, 2013 10:10 PM, "Sean Farley" <sean.michael.farley at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Dmitry Karpeev <karpeev at mcs.anl.gov>
> wrote:
> > > I personally find git (and its branches) rather cumbersome and wish
> libmesh
> > > used mercurial instead :-)
> >
> > Not to mention git's atrocious interface.
> Yes, I forgot to mention that.
> >
> > > And if hgsubversion actually worked there would no need for git :-)
> >
> > I've used that to access libmesh all the time; what didn't work?
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20130109/42809477/attachment.html>