[petsc-dev] Jed didn't like the directory private but he has no problem with finclude?

[Sean Farley]

>
>    Since AR Jed felt we should change the name of include/private (and I
> agree it was appropriate) shouldn't we also change the name of
> include/finclude?  It has the same problem of  pollution when dumped in a
> --prefix location.
>
>    Should it be petsc-fortran?  Or petsc-fortran-include?


You can call PETSc from fortran? How quaint! How about include/petsc-quaint?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120329/67de506d/attachment.html>