[petsc-dev] Jed didn't like the directory private but he has no problem with finclude?

Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov
Thu Mar 29 21:16:05 CDT 2012


    Since AR Jed felt we should change the name of include/private (and I agree it was appropriate) shouldn't we also change the name of include/finclude?  It has the same problem of  pollution when dumped in a --prefix location. 

    Should it be petsc-fortran?  Or petsc-fortran-include?


    Barry




More information about the petsc-dev mailing list