[petsc-dev] How does this compare...

[Hong Zhang]

Interesting paper. I'll read it and get back to you on "How does this
compare to
petsc MatMatMult().

Hong

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:

> to the new scalable MatMatMult() that is done in PETSc? Is it possible to
> even compare
> the flop rates sensibly?
>
>   http://arxiv.org/abs/1203.1692
>
> This is what Jeff is planning on using in his SciDAC.
>
>       Matt
>
> --
> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
> experiments lead.
> -- Norbert Wiener
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120323/8df27ee0/attachment.html>